New: what governed autonomous procurement actually means
Proconomy · Solutions · By outcome

Supplier Process Software Unified Across Four Functions

Onboarding, documents, performance, risk and quality stop being four partial views of the same supplier.

It starts here

A request, supplier response, due date, quality event or data condition starts the workflow instead of an email starting a conversation.

Proconomy runs

  1. TriggerWork enters the governed record
  2. AgentThe agent gathers what the decision needs
  3. RuleRules decide what may happen next
  4. AgentThe agent executes the authorised work
  5. HumanConsequential decisions return to people
  6. SystemThe approved outcome reaches the system of record
  7. RecordThe complete history is retained

What changes. And what stays exactly where it is.

Today

Four functions, four processes, four partial records.,Evidence chased separately by each function.,Expiry tracked in a spreadsheet.,Quality standing invisible to the sourcing decision.

Under governed execution

One governed process with four retained approval rights.,Evidence collected once and validated against requirements.,Expiry chased before it lapses.,Quality standing visible where suppliers are selected.

The parts that deliver this. Each one governed the same way.

  1. 01

    Supplier management

    Onboarding, qualification, documents and the supplier 360 record.

  2. 02

    Supplier portal

    One place for suppliers to submit, respond and maintain their information.

  3. 03

    Supplier quality management

    Corrective action, audits and change control connected to supplier standing.

  4. 04

    Sourcing & RFx

    Uses supplier standing to determine who may be invited to compete.

See exactly where it runs. And exactly where it stops for you.

The operating model behind every workflow on this page. One stage waits for a person.

  1. Trigger

    Work enters the governed record

    Nothing depends on a person noticing an inbox.

  2. Agent

    The agent gathers what the decision needs

    Work arrives decision-ready rather than partially formed.

  3. Rule

    Rules decide what may happen next

    The route is chosen by policy, not by who received the request.

  4. Agent

    The agent executes the authorised work

    Routine work progresses without a buyer moving every step.

  5. Human

    Consequential decisions return to people

    Authority stays exactly where your policy puts it.

  6. System

    The approved outcome reaches the system of record

    No manual re-entry, and the ERP stays authoritative.

  7. Record

    The complete history is retained

    A decision can be explained long after it was made.

Trigger

Work enters the governed record

Agent

The agent gathers what the decision needs

Rule

Rules decide what may happen next

Agent

The agent executes the authorised work

Human

Consequential decisions return to people

System

The approved outcome reaches the system of record

Record

The complete history is retained

Seen enough?

See this running on one of your own workflows, with your policy and your thresholds applied.

Someone from client success replies, not a sales sequence. The assessment asks for no email.

Answer “who approved this, and why” in seconds. Not in weeks.

Authority written down

Each agent carries an enumerated permitted-action set and a value ceiling you configure per entity.

Checkpoints that cannot be bypassed

Consequential decisions return to the people your policy names, and no configuration removes them.

Evidence without a separate tracker

Every action is attributed to an actor and the permission that allowed it, retrievable per transaction.

How this is adopted. One workflow at a time.

01

Map the requirement sets by entity

Documenting what each entity and industry actually requires is the substantive configuration work.

02

Onboard through the portal from day one

Collecting evidence once, at source, is what removes the duplicated chasing.

03

Move reviews from sequential to parallel

Most onboarding elapsed time is queueing between functions, not the reviews themselves.

04

Connect quality standing to eligibility last

Once the record is trusted, letting it influence sourcing eligibility is a small configuration change with a large effect.

Bring the workflow this describes. Not a vendor scenario.

One of your own processes, including the part that usually goes wrong. You will see where the agents act, where the platform stops, and what it leaves on the record.

Someone from client success replies, not a sales sequence. If we are not a fit we will say so on the first call.