Which procurement workflow should you govern first?
Rate eleven dimensions of your procurement operation against what actually happens rather than what the process document says. The result gives you a transparent score, a description of the stage you are at, and the three workflows most likely to be worth changing first. Nothing is submitted and no email address is required.
Answer honestly — the value is in the low scores
Your result
—
—
—
Where to start
Based on your three lowest-scoring dimensions, these workflows are the most likely candidates for a first governed workflow.
How this is scored. Each statement is rated 1 to 5, and the result is the unweighted mean across all 11 dimensions. The suggested starting points are simply your three lowest scores. This is a structured self-assessment for internal discussion, not consulting advice.
Want this to leave the browser?
Email yourself your maturity result
Nothing is stored until you ask for it. We will send your figures over — useful when you are writing the board paper a fortnight later.
Questions people ask. While the numbers are on screen.
About four minutes. Eleven statements, no email required, and the result appears in your browser without anything being submitted.
Honestly, and about how things actually work rather than how the process document describes them. The value is entirely in the low scores, because those identify where to start.
A maturity band, and the three workflows most likely to be worth governing first. It is a prioritisation aid rather than a diagnosis.
No. The assessment runs entirely in your browser and nothing is submitted. Emailing yourself the result is optional and offered only after the result is shown.
The average matters less than the spread
A team scoring 3.0 evenly across every dimension has a different problem from one scoring 4.5 on purchasing and 1.5 on supplier governance.
An even, low score
Coordination is manual across the board. Governing intake usually produces the fastest visible change, because it touches every function and improves everything downstream.
Strong purchasing, weak sourcing
The transactional end is under control and the commercial end is not. Sourcing coverage is normally the constraint, limited by setup and coordination effort rather than by judgement.
Strong process, weak governance
The steps exist but the rules are applied by people. Making the existing approval matrix executable is usually a short piece of configuration with a disproportionate effect.
Strong everywhere except AI readiness
The operation is well run but nobody has written down what software would be permitted to do. That definition is the prerequisite, and it is a governance exercise rather than a technical one.
Bring your lowest-scoring workflow to a demonstration.
The assessment points at a starting workflow. Watching that workflow run under governance is what tells you whether the approach fits.
Someone from client success replies, not a sales sequence. If we are not a fit we will say so on the first call.
Not ready to talk to anyone?
Fair enough. Both of these work without giving us your email.