Supplier Quality Management Software for APQP, PPAP and 8D
Close the issue without losing the evidence.
It starts here
An incoming inspection failure, line rejection, customer complaint or audit finding opens the case.
Proconomy runs
- TriggerA quality event is raised
- AgentThe corrective action request is issued with its requirements
- HumanContainment is reviewed by a quality specialist
- AgentRoot-cause and corrective evidence is collected and chased
- HumanQuality approves closure
- RecordSupplier history and standing are updated
A corrective action that stalls. Or one that closes with evidence.
A quality event is raised
What happens
An incoming inspection failure, line rejection, customer complaint or audit finding opens the case.
Corrective action with stages
SCAR and 8D issued with the evidence required and the deadline for each stage.
Root-cause and corrective evidence is collected and chased
What happens
Agents follow up outstanding 8D stages, request missing evidence and escalate overdue actions.
Launch readiness coordinated
APQP milestones and PPAP submissions tracked against the programme plan, not a spreadsheet.
Supplier history and standing are updated
What happens
The event, the evidence and the outcome update the supplier quality scorecard and status.
Audits connected to action
Findings become corrective actions with owners, rather than a report nobody opens.
Reviewed quarterly. Or present at the award.
-
01
Standing follows the supplier
Closure updates the scorecard, the supplier status and — under your rules — sourcing eligibility.
-
02
Change control before the change
Supplier and component changes route for assessment before they take effect.
-
03
Evidence assembled as you go
The pack exists when the auditor asks, because it was built while the work happened.
The corrective action request is issued with its requirements
What happens
The supplier receives the issue, the required 8D stages, the evidence expected and the deadlines.
Root-cause and corrective evidence is collected and chased
What happens
Agents follow up outstanding 8D stages, request missing evidence and escalate overdue actions.
Root-cause and corrective evidence is collected and chased
What happens
Agents follow up outstanding 8D stages, request missing evidence and escalate overdue actions.
See exactly where it runs. And exactly where it stops for you.
Six stages, each with a control you can point at. 2 of them wait for a person.
-
Trigger
A quality event is raised
The issue enters a governed process immediately.
-
Agent
The corrective action request is issued with its requirements
Suppliers know precisely what closure requires.
-
Human
Containment is reviewed by a quality specialist
Production risk is addressed before root cause work runs.
-
Agent
Root-cause and corrective evidence is collected and chased
Fewer issues stall waiting for someone to chase them.
-
Human
Quality approves closure
Closure means resolved, not merely responded to.
-
Record
Supplier history and standing are updated
Quality evidence enters the commercial decision.
A quality event is raised
The corrective action request is issued with its requirements
Containment is reviewed by a quality specialist
Root-cause and corrective evidence is collected and chased
Quality approves closure
Supplier history and standing are updated
Seen enough?
See Supplier quality management run on one of your own supplier quality management workflows, including the part that usually goes wrong.
Someone from client success replies, not a sales sequence. The assessment asks for no email.
Answer “who approved this, and why” in seconds. Not in weeks.
Routing agent
- Classify a request
- Permitted
- Request missing data
- Permitted
- Select buying route
- Permitted
- Approve above band
- Not permitted
Authority written down
Each agent carries an enumerated permitted-action set and a value ceiling you configure per entity.
Checkpoints that cannot be bypassed
Consequential decisions return to the people your policy names, and no configuration removes them.
Reconstructable
- Original request text
- Retained
- Rule that fired
- CAT-DRV-02
- Approvals and approvers
- Recorded
- Purchase order
- Written to ERP
Retrievable per transaction, without reading a mailbox
Evidence without a separate tracker
Every action is attributed to an actor and the permission that allowed it, retrievable per transaction.
What we need from you. Less than you think.
Your corrective action stages as they exist
The 8D or equivalent structure your quality team already runs.
Severity rules and escalation timings
What response each class of issue requires, and who it escalates to.
Named closure authority
Who may accept root cause and verify effectiveness.
Work with your existing tools.
Proconomy connects to the systems you already run. The ERP stays the system of record.
Where this already runs. In operations like yours.
- Industrial services and engineered products An industrial group unifies procurement across 18 operating companies 18 operating companies under one group 18 operating companiesOne group-level viewERP retained Read the story
- Automotive and mobility A global automotive manufacturer sees supplier risk beyond tier one Large, complex supplier ecosystem spanning tier one to tier N Tier 1 to tier N mappedOne supplier recordShared scorecards Read the story
Bring us a real Supplier quality management problem. Not a vendor scenario.
Not a vendor scenario — one of yours, including the part that usually goes wrong. You will see where the agents act, where the platform stops, and what it leaves on the record.
Someone from client success replies, not a sales sequence. If we are not a fit we will say so on the first call.
Not ready to talk to anyone?
Fair enough. Both of these work without giving us your email.