Multi-Entity Procurement Software for Groups and Plants
See the group. Govern the entity. Support the plant.
It starts here
Competitive sourcing rules, supplier qualification standards, segregation of duties and audit retention apply everywhere.
Proconomy runs
- RuleGroup policy defines what must be common
- RuleEntity rules set local authority
- RulePlant rules reflect operating reality
- SystemEach user sees the context their role and entity permit
- AgentThe same workflow behaves differently by entity
- RecordOne enterprise view without a consolidation cycle
One group policy framework. Local configuration inside it.
Group policy defines what must be common
What happens
Competitive sourcing rules, supplier qualification standards, segregation of duties and audit retention apply everywhere.
Group policy that cannot be switched off
Competitive sourcing, supplier qualification, segregation of duties, audit retention.
Each user sees the context their role and entity permit
What happens
Role- and entity-based access controls what data and actions are available.
Entity rules where authority differs
Thresholds, approvers, required documents and permitted buying routes, per legal entity.
One enterprise view without a consolidation cycle
What happens
Group leaders see work in progress, exceptions, policy variance and performance across entities.
Plant rules where reality differs
Escalation timings, catalogue scope and local supplier lists, per site.
A group view someone builds. Or a group view that exists.
-
01
Live group visibility
Work in progress, exceptions and policy variance across every entity.
-
02
Access that fits the role
Each user sees the context their role and entity permit, in both directions.
-
03
Acquisitions configured, not integrated
A new entity joins the framework with its own rules and appears from go-live.
Group policy defines what must be common
What happens
Competitive sourcing rules, supplier qualification standards, segregation of duties and audit retention apply everywhere.
Entity rules set local authority
What happens
Approval thresholds, approvers, required documents and permitted buying routes are configured per legal entity.
Plant rules reflect operating reality
What happens
Escalation timings for shift-critical requests, catalogue scope, local supplier lists and delivery conditions.
See exactly where it runs. And exactly where it stops for you.
Six stages, each with a control you can point at. Each one attributed to the actor and the rule that permitted it.
-
Rule
Group policy defines what must be common
Fewer local policy gaps and easier oversight.
-
Rule
Entity rules set local authority
Central governance with appropriate local flexibility.
-
Rule
Plant rules reflect operating reality
Local responsiveness without shadow processes.
-
System
Each user sees the context their role and entity permit
Secure collaboration between central and local teams.
-
Agent
The same workflow behaves differently by entity
Standardisation and local fit at the same time.
-
Record
One enterprise view without a consolidation cycle
Leadership works from a shared version of reality.
Group policy defines what must be common
Entity rules set local authority
Plant rules reflect operating reality
Each user sees the context their role and entity permit
The same workflow behaves differently by entity
One enterprise view without a consolidation cycle
Seen enough?
See Multi-entity management run on one of your own multi-entity management workflows, including the part that usually goes wrong.
Someone from client success replies, not a sales sequence. The assessment asks for no email.
Answer “who approved this, and why” in seconds. Not in weeks.
Routing agent
- Classify a request
- Permitted
- Request missing data
- Permitted
- Select buying route
- Permitted
- Approve above band
- Not permitted
Authority written down
Each agent carries an enumerated permitted-action set and a value ceiling you configure per entity.
Checkpoints that cannot be bypassed
Consequential decisions return to the people your policy names, and no configuration removes them.
Reconstructable
- Original request text
- Retained
- Rule that fired
- CAT-DRV-02
- Approvals and approvers
- Recorded
- Purchase order
- Written to ERP
Retrievable per transaction, without reading a mailbox
Evidence without a separate tracker
Every action is attributed to an actor and the permission that allowed it, retrievable per transaction.
What we need from you. Less than you think.
Your policy, written down
The thresholds, approvers and buying routes you already operate. Configuration is transcription, not redesign.
One data connection
Read access to the master and transaction data this workflow needs. Write-back is scoped separately.
A named process owner
One person who can settle "what should happen when…" without convening a committee.
Work with your existing tools.
Proconomy connects to the systems you already run. The ERP stays the system of record.
Where this already runs. In operations like yours.
- Industrial services and engineered products An industrial group unifies procurement across 18 operating companies 18 operating companies under one group 18 operating companiesOne group-level viewERP retained Read the story
- Automotive and mobility A global automotive manufacturer sees supplier risk beyond tier one Large, complex supplier ecosystem spanning tier one to tier N Tier 1 to tier N mappedOne supplier recordShared scorecards Read the story
Bring us a real Multi-entity management problem. Not a vendor scenario.
Not a vendor scenario — one of yours, including the part that usually goes wrong. You will see where the agents act, where the platform stops, and what it leaves on the record.
Someone from client success replies, not a sales sequence. If we are not a fit we will say so on the first call.
Not ready to talk to anyone?
Fair enough. Both of these work without giving us your email.