Proconomy · Industries · Medical devices

Medical Device Procurement Software for Qualification and Audit

Supplier qualification, controlled documentation, quality agreements and change approval as governed workflows.

It starts here

Component, device family, entity and supplier risk category are captured at the outset.

Proconomy runs

  1. TriggerThe supplier request records its intended use
  2. RuleQualification requirements are selected by risk category
  3. AgentEvidence is collected and validated
  4. HumanQuality, regulatory and procurement review in parallel
  5. HumanA quality agreement is executed
  6. RecordThe supplier is approved for a defined scope

What a request has to carry. Before anything can progress.

Supplier qualification

You can configure qualification requirements by supplier category and risk, with explicit approval scope and named approvers.

Controlled documentation

Required document types, versions and validity tracked against the supplier, with expiry chased before it lapses.

Quality agreements

Agreements created from approved templates, connected to the supplier record and the purchases made under them.

The workflows this changes. Each one governed the same way.

  1. 01

    Supplier management

    Qualification, document control and approval scope by supplier risk category.

  2. 02

    Contract lifecycle management

    Quality agreements from approved templates with tracked obligations.

  3. 03

    Supplier quality management

    Change control, audits and corrective action with human quality decisions.

  4. 04

    Security & AI governance

    Approval authority, segregation of duties and complete audit trail.

Every workflow above runs the same governed sequence. This is where it stops for a person.

See exactly where it runs. And exactly where it stops for you.

Qualifying a new supplier for a regulated component. A new supplier is proposed for a component used in a device family, requiring qualification before any purchase.

  1. Trigger

    The supplier request records its intended use

    Requirements are known before the supplier is contacted.

  2. Rule

    Qualification requirements are selected by risk category

    The right controls apply to the right supplier.

  3. Agent

    Evidence is collected and validated

    Less chasing, cleaner evidence.

  4. Human

    Quality, regulatory and procurement review in parallel

    Faster qualification without collapsing accountability.

  5. Human

    A quality agreement is executed

    Obligations become tracked commitments.

  6. Record

    The supplier is approved for a defined scope

    Purchasing can proceed within a controlled boundary.

Trigger

The supplier request records its intended use

Rule

Qualification requirements are selected by risk category

Agent

Evidence is collected and validated

Human

Quality, regulatory and procurement review in parallel

Human

A quality agreement is executed

Record

The supplier is approved for a defined scope

Seen enough?

See a medical devices workflow of your own run end to end, with your supplier requirements applied.

Someone from client success replies, not a sales sequence. The assessment asks for no email.

Answer “who approved this, and why” in seconds. Not in weeks.

Allowed actions

You list what each agent may do, and the most it can spend. You set both for every business unit.

Checkpoints that cannot be bypassed

Important decisions return to the people your policy names, and no configuration removes them.

Evidence without a separate tracker

Every action is attributed to an actor and the permission that allowed it, you can pull the trail for any order.

What stays with your people. Every one of these.

01

Decision 01

Qualification approval by quality, regulatory and procurement.

02

Decision 02

Acceptance of quality agreement deviations.

03

Decision 03

Assessment and approval of any supplier change.

04

Decision 04

Approval scope decisions covering components, device families and entities.

Bring a real medical devices workflow. Not a vendor scenario.

One of your own processes, including the part that usually goes wrong. You will see where the agents act, where the platform stops, and what it leaves on the record.

Someone from client success replies, not a sales sequence. If we are not a fit we will say so on the first call.