New: what governed autonomous procurement actually means
Proconomy · Source-to-Pay · Intake & orchestration

Procurement Intake Software

One governed front door for every plant, function and entity.

A plant engineer writes

Gearbox on line 3 has failed. Need a replacement this week.

Proconomy runs

  1. Request received
  2. Classified
  3. Missing data collected
  4. Route selected by rule
  5. Awaiting a named approver
  6. Purchase order in ERP

Needs arrive in every form. They leave in one.

Intake that reads plain language

An engineer describes a failed gearbox and Proconomy returns a categorised, costed, routed request.

Orchestration that starts the right process

Value, category, entity and risk select the buying route, so nothing depends on who opened the inbox.

Agents built for manufacturing procurement. Not a chatbot over your data.

  1. 01

    Classification agent

    Reads category, entity, plant, cost centre, value band and required date out of free text, and shows its working for correction.

  2. 02

    Completeness agent

    Asks the requester for the drawing, quantity or date the category requires, then resumes the moment it arrives.

  3. 03

    Routing agent

    Applies your approval matrix across entities, sends the reminders and escalates an overdue decision to the named alternate.

Watch a request become a purchase order. Nobody had to chase it.

Seven stages from the plant floor to your ERP. One of them waits for a person.

  1. Trigger

    A need is described

    A plant engineer writes what the line needs, in their own words.

  2. Agent

    The request is classified

    Category, entity, cost centre and value band are read out of the text.

  3. Agent

    What is missing is collected

    The drawing reference and delivery date are requested from the requester.

  4. Rule

    Policy selects the route

    Catalogue, contract, sourcing or onboarding — and the rule that fired is stored.

  5. Human

    A named person decides

    Nothing above your threshold is auto-approved and the checkpoint cannot be configured away.

  6. System

    The ERP is updated

    The approved outcome is written back to the system of record you already have.

  7. Record

    The history stays linked

    Original text, extracted data, applied rule, approvals and outcome, as one record.

Trigger

A need is described

Agent

The request is classified

Agent

What is missing is collected

Rule

Policy selects the route

Human

A named person decides

System

The ERP is updated

Record

The history stays linked

Answer “who approved this, and why” in seconds. Not in weeks.

Authority written down

Each agent carries an enumerated permitted-action set and a value ceiling you configure per entity.

Checkpoints that cannot be bypassed

Consequential decisions return to the people your policy names, and no configuration removes them.

Evidence without a separate tracker

Every action is attributed to an actor and the permission that allowed it, retrievable per transaction.

Nothing is broken. Which is why it survives every cost review.

Intake failure never appears as a budget line. It appears as these.

Coverage stops at team capacity

The categories nobody had a spare week for go to renewal untested, at the incumbent’s price.

The approval matrix describes intent

When the route depends on who opened the inbox, policy is advisory — and nobody can say by how much.

Continuity sits inside people

The buyers holding the thresholds are the routing engine. Their notice period is your recovery window.

Audit shows what, not why

Mailboxes evidence the purchase. They rarely evidence the rule that permitted it.

Work with your existing tools.

Proconomy connects to the systems you already run. The ERP stays the system of record.

SAP S/4HANA
Oracle Fusion
Microsoft Dynamics 365
Microsoft Teams
Outlook
Slack
Microsoft Entra ID
ServiceNow

Five people feel this differently. Only one of them raises it.

The complaint that reaches the executive is rarely the one that costs the most.

Chief Procurement Officer

Group · Multi-entity

Top painI am asked what proportion of our spend followed policy, and I can give an opinion rather than a number.

What changesEvery request stores the rule that routed it, so policy adherence becomes a number you report.

Head of Procurement Excellence

Process · Group-wide

Top painI have written the policy three times. It is still applied differently at every plant, and I find that out at audit.

What changesPolicy is executed rather than circulated, and entity differences are configured once.

Plant buyer

Operational · Site

Top painMost of my week goes on working out what people actually asked for, then chasing the half of it they did not send.

What changesRequests arrive classified, complete and routed. The chasing happens before a buyer sees them.

Finance approver

Control · Entity

Top painI approve things whose justification sits in an email thread I was never on, and I approve them late because nobody told me they were waiting.

What changesThe request, the rule and the justification arrive together, with a reminder before it is late.

Internal audit and compliance

Assurance · Group

Top painI can prove what was bought. I cannot prove why it was allowed to be bought that way, and that is the question being asked.

What changesRequest, extracted data, rule, approvals and transaction stay linked as one record.

Before you book anything. Four questions, answered honestly.

Do we have to fix our category structure first?

No. Start with the structure your buyers already use. Classification is corrected in the flow of work rather than in a cleansing project.

Does this replace our ERP?

No. The ERP stays the system of record and receives the approved outcome. Nothing is migrated out of it.

Who needs to be in the first session?

One person who can settle a rules question without convening a committee, and someone who knows how your ERP is actually used. Two people is usually enough.

What if we are a single plant?

Then coordination is probably still manageable by hand, and we will say so on the first call rather than after a pilot.

Bring us a real intake problem. Not a vendor scenario.

One of your own requests, including the part that usually goes wrong. You will see where the agents act, where the platform stops, and what it leaves on the record.

Someone from client success replies, not a sales sequence. If we are not a fit we will say so on the first call.