Automotive Procurement Software for Launch, Quality and Change
Supplier qualification, PPAP submissions, corrective action and change control on the same platform as sourcing and purchasing.
It starts here
The rejection is raised against the part, the supplier and the plant, with severity classified by rule.
Proconomy runs
- TriggerA batch is rejected at incoming inspection
- AgentA corrective action request is issued with required stages
- HumanQuality reviews containment
- AgentOutstanding evidence is chased and escalated
- HumanQuality approves closure
- RecordSupplier standing and sourcing eligibility update
What a request has to carry. Before anything can progress.
A batch is rejected at incoming inspection
What happens
The rejection is raised against the part, the supplier and the plant, with severity classified by rule.
Tiered supplier qualification
Different requirements by tier, commodity and plant, with approval scope defined per entity rather than assumed group-wide.
A corrective action request is issued with required stages
What happens
The supplier receives the issue, the 8D stages expected, the evidence required and the deadlines.
Part and process approval coordination
Workflows you configure for advanced product quality planning (APQP) milestones and production part approval process (PPAP) submissions, with named owners and evidence retained.
Quality reviews containment
What happens
Sorting, stock screening and interim actions are assessed before investigation continues.
Corrective action with evidence
Supplier corrective action request (SCAR) and 8D stages, containment review, root-cause acceptance and effectiveness verification, each with a human decision point.
The workflows this changes. Each one governed the same way.
-
01
Supplier quality management
APQP and PPAP coordination, SCAR and 8D, audits and change control.
-
02
Supplier management
Tier- and plant-specific qualification with explicit approval scope.
-
03
Sourcing & RFx
Eligibility restricted to approved sources with quality standing visible.
-
04
Multi-entity management
Group quality policy with plant-specific thresholds and approvers.
Quality approves closure
What happens
Root cause, corrective action and verification of effectiveness are accepted by a named quality role.
Every workflow above runs the same governed sequence. This is where it stops for a person.
See exactly where it runs. And exactly where it stops for you.
Supplier corrective action, from line rejection to updated supplier standing. A rejection at incoming inspection at one plant, handled as a governed workflow rather than an email chain.
-
Trigger
A batch is rejected at incoming inspection
The issue enters a governed process immediately.
-
Agent
A corrective action request is issued with required stages
The supplier knows precisely what closure requires.
-
Human
Quality reviews containment
Line risk is addressed before root-cause work runs.
-
Agent
Outstanding evidence is chased and escalated
Issues stop stalling because nobody chased them.
-
Human
Quality approves closure
Closure means resolved rather than answered.
-
Record
Supplier standing and sourcing eligibility update
Quality evidence reaches the next commercial decision.
A batch is rejected at incoming inspection
A corrective action request is issued with required stages
Quality reviews containment
Outstanding evidence is chased and escalated
Quality approves closure
Supplier standing and sourcing eligibility update
Seen enough?
See an automotive workflow of your own run end to end, with your supplier requirements applied.
Someone from client success replies, not a sales sequence. The assessment asks for no email.
Answer “who approved this, and why” in seconds. Not in weeks.
Routing agent
- Classify a request
- Permitted
- Request missing data
- Permitted
- Select buying route
- Permitted
- Approve above band
- Not permitted
Allowed actions
You list what each agent may do, and the most it can spend. You set both for every business unit.
Checkpoints that cannot be bypassed
Important decisions return to the people your policy names, and no configuration removes them.
Reconstructable
- Original request text
- Retained
- Rule that fired
- CAT-DRV-02
- Approvals and approvers
- Recorded
- Purchase order
- Written to ERP
You can pull the trail for any order, without reading a mailbox
Evidence without a separate tracker
Every action is attributed to an actor and the permission that allowed it, you can pull the trail for any order.
What stays with your people. Every one of these.
Decision 01
Containment adequacy assessment.
Decision 02
Root-cause acceptance and effectiveness verification.
Decision 03
Part approval and submission acceptance decisions.
Decision 04
Approval or rejection of a supplier or component change.
Where this already runs. In operations like yours.
- Industrial services and engineered products An industrial group unifies procurement across 18 operating companies 18 operating companies under one group 18 operating companiesOne group-level viewERP retained Read the story
- Automotive and mobility A global automotive manufacturer sees supplier risk beyond tier one Large, complex supplier network spanning tier one to tier N Tier 1 to tier N mappedOne supplier recordShared scorecards Read the story
Bring a real automotive workflow. Not a vendor scenario.
One of your own processes, including the part that usually goes wrong. You will see where the agents act, where the platform stops, and what it leaves on the record.
Someone from client success replies, not a sales sequence. If we are not a fit we will say so on the first call.
Not ready to talk to anyone?
Fair enough. Both of these work without giving us your email.